Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
1031 Exchanges
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 5 years ago,

User Stats

4
Posts
0
Votes
Paul True
  • Merlin, OR
0
Votes |
4
Posts

1031 How to show Boot on 8824

Paul True
  • Merlin, OR
Posted

I have a completed exchange where property taxes were deducted as part of the sale on the relinquished property. The amount sent to the intermediary was shorted by that amount. The exchange involved no debt and was exchanged for a property of higher value. I understand that the taxes are considered an operating expense and should have been paid with a check to avoid gain/boot but regrettably that didn't happen. What I am trying to understand is how I now correctly show the amount that was used for Property Tax on Form 8824. The amount was effective cash removed from the sale proceeds, but of course that cash had to be made up on the acquired property. Super confusing and all the info out there seems to assume someone hasn't yet made a mistake. Any help will be greatly appreciated.