I stepped away from the forums for a few days to work on real deals.Re-reading this thread and your posts in particular, I think your biggest challenge is that you automatically get associated with all the other would-be real estate people.Part of the problem is your message.

Christine,The 70% of ARV strategy is great but these vary based on risk/reward and supply/demand.  

Now, I challenge you to take another." - Dan PoynterLastly, don't forget that we are here to help and likewise learn from your contributions.

Crap for 1 to 15k per house if you have to just abandon one because it did not work no biggee.. you have lost next to nothing monetarily. keep the ones that work throw away the garbage let them go for tax's.If your sitting in CA or AU or GB  or other foreign countries and you think these cheap homes are going to make you rich.. then your just perpetuating the greater fool theory in my mind... and the end of the day simple logic has to dictate.. if houses on the open market were any investor  experienced or not can purchase them for 1 to 5k  well then there is a reason.. and there is a reason that in LA or SF or PDX or SEA  or New York or Boston or other prime markets that values are where they are at.. supply demand and ability to pay for the asset.Detroit bottom line just needs to retrench.. if its only 700k pop now and declining and there were housing stock for double that.. it does not take a genius to understand there is a gross over supply and the better owners or tenants are not going to live in the roughest and most dangerous areas of the city they will flee to safer more stable environs because there are massive amounts of homes that can be bought in nice areas for 100k and under.

@Nick ClurmanRent is a function of supply and demand.

I would be really careful about giving him credit cards to purchase supplies.  

If you ask them to objectively evaluate the condition of the house - say on a scale of 1 to 10 - your start creating doubt in their mind about the value of the house and set the stage for you telling them why you can only offer $X on the property, because there are $20k in repairs that are needed.By asking them where they came up with the number they are using as the value, you set the stage for challenging that belief, without it sounding like you are challenging them.Language is a powerful tool.  

My wife and I have invested in relatively low end townhouses in MoCo, however we are finding it challenging to find multi-family in that area or any place close to DC within our price range/level of risk.Either we've felt uncomfortable with the expense of the multi-family properties or (perhaps incorrectly) equated the higher priced properties as a tradeoff of low cash flow and possibly higher appreciation (due to increasing rents) vs higher current cash flow and lower appreciation in the more remote areas.

The lawyer said there are 1000s of transactions going on where these rules are not being followed and there are probably gray ares if someone wants to challenge, but thankfully my husband had the years of experience and we had the assets required to make the class A licensing possible with a just a few prep classes. 

Nothing wrong with that, but it might present a few challenges when asking for 100k on what sounds to be a multifaceted first deal.