Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
Results (10,000+)
Ben Jones Reverse short sale
18 September 2019 | 10 replies
Why would they sell it to you at a loss, when they just have to wait for the auction ( if the process has already begun) to recover everything? 
Samuel M. Turnkey
22 January 2017 | 48 replies
It might make sense to put your money into real estate to eke out a small profit or sustain a small operating loss IF the property were likely to appreciate - but these midwest turn key houses will not appreciate.  
Leah Ezra How to keep a home in foreclosure with no paperwork
2 February 2016 | 12 replies
If so, nothing can be done without contacting the current note/mortgage holder, their loss mitigation dept.  
Michelle Sinclair Probates- Never heard of
19 November 2015 | 10 replies
You could absolutely be right, Probates could be a loss cause here and that's why no one is doing them.
Annette A. swimming up river against the crowd- negative people surround me
25 April 2016 | 67 replies
I am at a loss as they are extremely well funded & do not need the father 'financially', furthermore he cannot 'swing a hammer' & his advice on REI, rehab fundamentals etc is way off base (yet he proudly proclaims that he has a substantial investment in the Iraqi Dinar & advised all his kids to invest heavily into silver when it hit $50/ounce !!!)
Kevin Lewis Contract's Insurance Clause
18 August 2015 | 9 replies
She just doesn't want to because she doesn't think it's necessary.I have a Risk of Loss clause which allows for an option out if the property were to be damagedClause:RISK OF LOSS: If subject property is damaged prior to transfer of title, Buyer has the option of accepting any insurance proceeds with title to the property in “as is” condition or of canceling this contract and accepting the return of the deposit.so I didn't  necessarily see an issue with excluding it in an addendum, but I'm not 100% sure.Does anyone see this as being a issue the may come back to bite me?
Ann Howell Arbor Trace Property Management
2 December 2019 | 36 replies
I suppose I should just cut my losses and find another PM. 
Sandy Reddy Sheriff sale property
15 January 2016 | 9 replies
They have no incentive to sell the property at a loss, most cases the bad debt was from another bank that went under and is insured to the full loan amount.
Karen M. Considering a real estate career - tell me the ups and downs
28 December 2015 | 13 replies
Like starting any small business, it requires capital, as well as the fact that you will likely operate at a loss for sometime before turning a profit.  
Matt Powell BRRRR Strategy - I don't get it.. what am I missing?
3 January 2016 | 54 replies
Of course, if the property declines in value, that's a loss.