I want to keep it strictly cash flow though I feel it would get too complicated if I gave them all the tax benefits of the property as well.

What would be the benefits of one over the other? 

It seems like it is coming from a place of good intention, but is not particularly well thought out and opens the door for a lot of serious issues.I fully understand the therapeutic and healing benefits of pets for certain people, but there are already protections in place for service animals as well as emotional support animals that protect this subset of pet owners so I don't really understand why this bill is necessary - seems like it will cause far more harm than good, and again, this is coming from someone that likes pets! 

These are fundamental concepts that are explained in David's book and I think you could benefit from before jumping in.

From what I know about MHP is that limited CAPEX expenses if a huge benefit of the deal.

Now you understand that long leases are no hedge of protection for you they only benefit the tenant !

2)Will I then be able to do repairs on the property myself personally or would this beat the benefit on having a land trust for privacy. 

Although it may feel inhumane to ask people to leave, keep in mind that these same people would move out in one second if it benefited them.

Instead I like to pay attention to all the ways owning property can generate returns, including positive monthly cash flow but also including depreciation tax benefits, principle pay down, and appreciation.

I'm glad to hear you have benefited from the knowledge on this platform.