The ORT is 100% weighted in tenant favour, if you’re ever granted even $1 assume consider it gravy.

The disadvantages I hear people say, in my opinion don’t hold that much weight.

In my opinion, it is best to mitigate damage and allow them.The investor I had mentioned is probably worth $60+ million so to me, his advice bears a lot of weight.

There's usually some pretty good people who monitor that page.  

Loyalty is hard to come by and holds its weight with high value individuals. 

So making observations on more or less profitable areas is racist if the demographics aren't weighted the same?

Hi EveryoneA few years ago I was required to install a monitored fire alarm panel in my 8 plex. 

But I am not sure I want to use that because first, I really can't be there to monitor if a BF is there more than 7 days in a month, and second, I really don't care how often the BF stays, it is the parking space congestion issue I need to resolve.A casual conversation with the tenant resulting in her playing dumb..."

Your PM should have done that after the first time they didn't provide access to the property.Secondly, this is the price investors pay for investing in places where the laws are heavily weighted in the favor of the tenants.

You could chance it and if you get called out you will have to change it back or just leave it as is and set up a joint checking acct. with the current owner and pay from there so he can monitor the activity and know that the bills are being paid on time.