27 January 2014 | 7 replies
Wouldn't that kill the entire purpose of what I'm doing?
27 January 2014 | 8 replies
Compare apples to apples and listen
29 January 2014 | 5 replies
For educational purposes, can you tell me what is wrong with the uploaded one?
25 January 2014 | 0 replies
For doing commercial/ business purpose loans (secured by real estate ) is there any guide available on Dept of Business Oversight or any other place to conform to The CFLL - California Finance Lenders Law?
27 January 2014 | 4 replies
One other thing that is appealing to the current owners is getting a decent rate on the notes they would carry, compared to the fixed rate products that they would be likely to put their money in such as CDs.
26 January 2014 | 4 replies
How would your rent compare to the going rents in the area?
25 January 2014 | 4 replies
Simply by doing a drive by and running comparables this house completely redone can be moved for a easy 175k-200k.
26 January 2014 | 12 replies
The exclusion is reduced pro rata by comparing the number of years the property is used for non-primary residence purposes to the total number of years the property is owned by the taxpayer.
1 February 2014 | 34 replies
But as a heads up make sure your HVAC guy gives you ALL the paperwork & that the new fce & A/C units are registered for warranty purposes.
26 January 2014 | 9 replies
[Granted, I don't know how you are creating the splits for tax purposes, but an issue could happen on the income or the expense side of things.]