@Steve Babiak, I'm trying to figure the logic behind those questions.

Being all pragmatic and logical.  

Ah, rational and logical things that we would love to be able to do (change the locks), that would, alas, land us in court on the bad side of the courts here in CA,  land of the Free(loaders) and of the Bra(zen professional tenants).... .

I still agree with your logic 100%.Why would I take such risks?

If that logic is true, then I guess that means that if the tenant has any other crazy thing in the home, I'm liable if one of their buddies injures themselves on that too.I'm not saying that isn't possible, but I am questioning how our legal system allows that kind of silliness to go on.A landlord should not be liable for any toy some tenant's friend hurts themselves on.

Sue I completely agree with your logic.

I agree with your logic.  

Again, your statement is logical, but you would likely have some work to do to prove your point in any kind of public arena.

I'm pretty sure Sue Kelly's logic is correct but I'd run it by an experience landlord-tenant attorney on the chance there are local or state laws that apply and to confirm that Sue and I are correct.  

His logic was that we would get multiple offers the first weekend it went on the market.