Gone above budget but I know that is a common problem for the first flip..

I can draw no clue from the index, where they have articles for ownership, improvement of common area, architectural control, ect.

Am working to add a Q&A of commonly asked questions regarding tenant representation.

Andrew: Estoppel is a legal doctrine in common law to prevent a person {in the instance of a real estate transaction, the Vendor} from conveying or asserting an untruth.

But it wasn’t any common thief, as WPLG Local 10 News reports.Link to full article

Why would an owner would want to finance at 0% and is this common?

Is this a common practice or is it frowned upon?

I hope some of you seasoned investors will address my questions, which will be common knowledge to you, with sincerity and patience.

Here is how it would work:- According to the Arizona Condominium Act 80% of the unit holders can choose to dissolve the HOA by vote…which we have- Once dissolved, each unit holder becomes 1/7 owner in common of the complex- We could then vote to sell the entire complex to an affiliated company at market price and in essence force the remaining unit holder to take a bath on price and move (and if he had a mortgage he could still be responsible for the difference in UPB - purchase price!)

If you would like to repeat something anyone here has said in public, adapting it to a conversation as a comment, that's one thing, using common knowledge to express your position or point of view, to some extent.