26 November 2011 | 50 replies
Plus, they point out that the properties are nicely rehabbed, in solid neighborhoods with high rental demand, tenants are rigorously screened, and to cap it off, the buyer may well sell the property at a big gain well before these repairs and capital expenses start hitting (remember, you presumably "captured" a boatload of equity when you purchased), at which time you can roll into another property.At any rate, if you hold the property, the assumption is that Years 2-30 will experience none of these expenses.
24 November 2011 | 3 replies
I think my wife and I would rent for just three years at least you have a solid exit strategy.
25 November 2011 | 3 replies
It may not be much more than one of the items I listed above and doesn't necessarily make the place a toxic waste dump.
8 December 2011 | 2 replies
Nick, banks generally don't list homes at 33% of FMV, how solid are your numbers?
11 December 2011 | 7 replies
In some ways it kind of seems like a waste when a lot of people in the area would probably love to have that tax rate.
14 December 2011 | 40 replies
It's frustrating me, because I'm still working on Private Lending, but I'd like to be able to get some solid comps and start running numbers on some properties, to present to my potential lender.
29 November 2012 | 5 replies
So many gurus will tell you to build your buyers list first, in my opinion, that is a waste of time.
11 December 2011 | 7 replies
Both of your points are solid advice.
22 December 2011 | 6 replies
Now we are wasting time & money due to the upcoming Holidays!
5 January 2016 | 33 replies
"It's not enough, I know that already, that's a waste of time".