18 February 2007 | 3 replies
Hi Ryan,thanks for the helpful advice. that is pretty much what I thought. the reason I brought up the possibility of buying the second trust at a discount is to better position myself vis a vis the "tenant" who has put so much money into the house and really wants to buy it.that is the most positive thing here for me: someone else wants the house. if I hold the second trust and the bidding goes up above the first trust, penalty, interests and costs, wouldn't I be in a reasonable position with respect to the other bidder(s)?
23 February 2007 | 8 replies
Does anyone else feel like this is just too far?
15 November 2007 | 59 replies
All my friends and family are switching over, why not with the new policy change all of us as of this Janurary can switch are rental properties to a 2% or lower rate.See for yourself at 2percentmortgages.comMy family and all my friends have switched over why not everyone else?
21 February 2007 | 7 replies
You would include holding costs, rehab, downpayments, and anyting else out of pocket.
25 February 2007 | 3 replies
It's always nice to have someone else around who seems to know the gig who's always looking for more answers and knowledge.
22 February 2007 | 6 replies
Does anyone else besides you and the original lien holder have any claim to this property?
5 March 2007 | 26 replies
How many times have you gone to an open house or gone through a house with a realtor and asked "Do you know of anything else interesting"?
10 May 2008 | 21 replies
But, if you're buying it yourself, renting it out, wholesaling or anything else, then you shouldn't have to run your deals through them.
6 March 2007 | 12 replies
I was suggesting you go that route as a way for you to get into the market and making offers just like everyone else even if you have little to no funds to work with.
28 February 2007 | 2 replies
My understanding is that as long as you only advertising the properties for someone else then you are fine.