Claim they are violating your rights because they did not like you.2)  Say you believe the contractor damaged your building to lower your property value because of a potential eminent domain case because someone at the city does not like you.3)  Explain to them that the city should not damage the property in any manner because you might ask that it be returned to you as part of a 42 U.S.C 1983 claim.4)  Explain to them that you will be morally obligated to give notice to any potential buyer or anyone providing financing of the potential litigation.5)  Explain to them you would love to save everyone the years of time and the fortune in legal fees but now that the city has resorted to violence, it is hard to imagine them paying a fair price.That is what I would do if they were mean to me and damaged my building with an excavator.

I would go as far as calling the local DA, State Attorney General, Council member, Civil Justice whomever (they may laugh at me) there has to be some agency in your area you could report her to.

The police are trained in criminal law, but are usually pretty clueless when it comes to civil law.I once had a judgment against a deadbeat tenant who moved out most of her things.

Well I admit that maybe because she felt that I was accusing her that's why she became angry, but I could not tolerant someone who cannot have a civil conversation.

I'm a civil engineer by day, and I know one of the guys in the office is having trouble with a wall over 12 ft right now due to the design/calculations necessary.

My husband, David is a Civil Engineer.

Im in no way a lawyer, an asset protection specialist or a litigator......but I would think any lawyer could easily pierce the liability shield of an LLC when it is funded with debt in an individuals name.

As all these problems arise again, it will likely swing back to sellers understanding that it’s going to cost them just as much for the firm to represent them in the event of an unrepresented buyer as it would if they just paid a buyer agent fee, but they’re more protected from future litigation if the buyer has their own representation vs claiming they were misled by a seller or seller’s agent.

Seasoned brokers hate this because they are opening themselves up for litigation.

Yes, but he/she could also face consequences (litigation) for defaming a person in writing (libel).