Increase in family size:A Borrower may be eligible for another house with an FHA-insured Mortgage if the Borrower provides satisfactory evidence that: • the Borrower has had an increase in legal dependents and the Property now fails to meet family needs; and • the Loan-to-Value (LTV) ratio on the current Principal Residence is equal to or less than 75% or is paid down to that amount, based on the outstanding Mortgage balance and a current residential appraisal.

I would say one of the things you want from the borrower would be the note on the first and evidence that payments are made each month.

If I am wrong, please post evidence to the contrary.

The benefits of non-recourse loans are fairly self evident.

I have done everything within legal bounds correctly and have all the evidence to defend the deductions. 

Of course they sell an 'installed product' so it is not readily evident, but I want everyone to make money so they're around for the next job and the next....I see no point in being so tight with every dollar, it serves no one's best interests...not even the investor who is trying to pinch every penny.

If this is the case, and you are still trying to cut her out, then it's evident that you're trying to get a discounted deal. 

There is no presented evidence that suggests the buyer can buy the house.But we're going to counter with an offer so aggressive that (we suspect) there is no way the buyer can agree to.

This means they must provide credible evidence to support their claims and comply with all substantiation and record-keeping requirements mandated by the tax code.Despite the taxpayers' testimony that the RV served as a boat sales office and provided nighttime security, they failed to produce any records or documentation to substantiate these claims.

Hey there,Kudos on investing time and effort in learning about real estate—it's evident you've done your homework.