It's apples to oranges, not a great comparison. 

I would simply pick how you want to look at it, and then assess all deals in the same way, so you have apples to apples comparison.

It's comparing apples to orangutans. 

you're asking if you should buy apples or helicopters. 

So it's not apples to apples. 

For equestrian activities, you can stable your string of horses in barns, paddocks, fenced corrals and multiple trails that wind through the dramatic landscape.

Imagine if you could buy apple stock without using your own money, but you get all the appreciation and dividends.

And of course, doesn't matter where there're always good and bad apples... as much as they try to remove the bad ones, it's still your job to pick out the good ones.If you have any questions, feel free to reach out.

In my opinion cash on hand is not as good an indicator of a buyers ability to qualify if you are comparing apples to apples when it comes to low money down financing. 

That's how many of the larger complexes get funding to buy and rehab buildings,, that the normal small investor can not afford.Section 8 like other government programs has difficult aspects to it to manage, the people on section 8 are like a bushel of apples, some good some rotten to the core, and when mixed together the entire bushel tends to go rotten if the rotten apples aren't tossed out of the bushel.LOTS of paperwork and inspections and the inspectors are just as complicated as the tenants sometimes.