Just a waste of time and energy.Kind of like getting pulled over for a DUI and asking the prosecuting attorney to represent you.

Under Wisconsin Fair Housing laws, those receiving public assistance are a protected class, meaning that if you were to say "no Section 8", you could be fined or prosecuted.  

its not legal as most do it in all 50 states just not enforced or prosecuted.. you can close on the home then advertise it for sure.. cant advertise homes you don't own and the equitable interest theory does not stand when you sole business purpose is to emulate real estate broker activities..  

Once he was caught he made restitution, sold his home and moved away to avoid prosecution.

I would also point out civil asset forfeiture is more likely because it really does pay for itself.You might also want to follow the many cases where people are challenging prosecution by claiming equal protection violations.

HUD basically never refers that for prosecution. 

Now the amount of properties available are slim, but not sure how ready they are going to be to fight/prosecute you... for having a discounted rent option for "Good Neighbors Next Door"Good Luck on whatever you do!

sure thing.your developer/buyer/builder is going to need to pay out side consultants to prosecute the subdivision plat.. this may include among other things the following depending on jurisdiction:survey workengineering worksoil  testinggeo tech reports.city and state applicationsetc etc.. you want it in your contract that when this developer pays for these items.. that they are also your property.. in other words if he does not follow through he hands them over to you.. because these items are the property of who ever hired the consultant you have to specify in your contract that the buyer if they don't go through with the deal will hand this stuff over to you.this will help U resell if needed or prosecute the map your self without having to pay for these things all over again.

Any suggestions in dealing with HOAs that are not willing to discount the back dues owed, even from their failure to prosecute the delinquent prior owner only because their CC&R allows them to claim everything and the kitchen sink?

I think I've read about cases that were criminally prosecuted for doing this.