They want to do deals, but have less incentive to close particular deals than either the buyer or seller.  .It's like playing chicken with someone in a sufficiently large car such that they aren't actually going to be harmed by the impact, meanwhile you are riding a bicycle with no helmet.

Some people will believe that that evil person should have to pay for harming that poor young lamb of a tenant.

If you have contingency in your offer to end the lease and seller doesn't want to do it, you can get out of the deal with no harm. 

As a landlord, your tenant can cause much more harm to you than you can to him.

I am not impressed by these kinds of "headlines" because they don't do the average investor any good and could actually do harm.  

I might start by seeing if the current set-up is harmful or unlawful.

These are more of a nuisance claim with the payouts being $5k-$15k by the claim adjuster for a quick close.  1 of these claims wont hurt your insurance premiums, but multiple claims will harm you as the underwriters will feel the property is not being properly maintained.

I want my target reach to be families and business men that want a professional car and that way it will keep the car clean and from any harm listed on this forum you guys mentioned.

No harm renting here for a short time while you get your bearings in a new city.

I work as a contract pressure vessel, piping, and storage tank inspector at refineries, chemical plants, natural gas plants, or just about anywhere else there's a need throughout the US or world.