Either way, you are going to fulfill your mortgage loan commitment...1 year of actually living there.

If it's just communicating with the owner, then you have fulfilled your responsibility.

It's just saying that both sides have the same rights - if one side doesn't fulfill their end, the other side can terminate their offer or sue for actual damages. 

If using this approach, ask for first and last months rent and consider offering them a small discount if they fulfill the lease terms. 

So you have some onerous city imposed requirements to fulfill.

If she's saying she can't fulfill the original terms of the original contract, cut ties. 

But, I think it's absolutely un-American to tell private business owners that they must fulfill the role of the government, and at a loss of profit to boot.It's like eminent domain without the required compensation! 

When He transformed my life, I found a fulfilling life and purpose.

The entire purpose of a holding agreement is to hold the property for the applicant until they fulfill lease obligations. 

So, I think the concept can't be applied successfully there.My problem with people using this argument, is that they're not only saying they can't fulfill their contract, but they're going beyond then just ending the contract.