The SEC says it's more about the quality of the relationship than the quantity of time; but there should be a passage of time between when you first met and when they made you an offer to invest (more than hours or days); and they shouldn't be offering you "current or contemplated deals" that were in play at the time you first met - they should only be offering you future investment opportunities.

I don't like putting those  names in a general forum post, because sometimes after the passage of time an attorney will move in a different direction as far as specialties, but their name is still hanging out there in the forums.

Seems sellers and agents were somewhat responsible for not disclosing that they allowed neighbors passage over the years.

I really hope this works out for you.Jeff this is a very well-written passage from someone who clearly has a lot of experience in PML.

If your lockouts are happening because of locked handles, switch over to passage.  

Originally posted by Don Konipol:If they can not obtain needed financing for whatever reason, then they are not able to pay that amount and hence that amount can not be considered market value.Nice post Don.This passage above gets to the heart of the matter.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------NOTE: I address your passage above by excerpting it in [brackets]---------------------------------------------------------------------------------[[I think your typical investor in rentals already has a home they own.

Also, if they actually pass these Reforms, that may only apply to new businesses AFTER the passage since those of us who have already bought the Investments (or businesses) was not able to write off the purchase of that business in the beginning.This is going to be REALLY messy.Investor Llew

While OR does both, the benefit of doing Judicial foreclosure versus non judicial ended with the passage of SB558.

It does have updated passages as well.