Do you have witnesses that will testify she had first hand knowledge?

By doing this, if they were to try and sue you, you can state that you were personally there and witnessed xxxxxxxx (nothing going on).

She never abused the privilege and I would've put a quick stop to it if she had.To your second point: true, but I feel like I'm responding to the usual false dichotomy often presented in discussions of PM: to wit, EITHER:Pay 10% of gross revenues to have PM; OR:Personally make 3AM calls to deal with clogged toiletsI'm merely challenging this notion.

Hence why I said you can't exactly compare the two and I highlighted the fact that Compton endures more violent crimes than Inglewood (and as you've mentioned, Inglewood witnesses higher property crime rates).

I know because I have witnessed the process first-hand.He would have to most likely file a claim online, possibly by phone.  

Wonder why the bill was so high, I witnessed this all myself when she said it was cold in the house and I had to "do something about it".

I know/suspect this because I personally witnessed the property marker in the ground, then pulled out of the ground and laying at a later date, then pounded back into the ground another later date, neither by my own hand, with the only person with an interest in doing so being my neighbor.

I have 2 witnesses that can testify that I did not have mold in my addict.

In PA you need a witness to hand serve someone.

That could be done with tracking of some kind, or if the process server had a witness with them, maybe.