@Jackie Lange Thank you so much for the rundown on the foundation issue and to @Joseph Weisenbloom for the reality check.I didn't do a good job of communicating that as I'm abroad for the time being, I'm just using the data at my finger tips to do simulations and practice the math.

If you plan on expanding on this particular model and adding things like sensitivity analysis or any type of simulation then I'd back track a bit and create separate input screens that then feeds your actual model.

Yes I've been thinking this for years, I do run a lot of complex economic simulations, DST is not interested in the QE environment but DST becoming sexy in QT environment. 

Not the indoor simulators but the full blown driving range. 

The lender could try running a what if simulator. 

In the old days before digital mapping, computerized flood simulations, and years of rainfall data, the floodplains were not as precise.

I'll definitely go back to the drawing board with the inclusion of the acquisition fee and simulation the various split scenarios you described. 

The price is usually about 2 to 3 times that of the laminate and vinyl simulated wood planks though. 

Ratings are determined using procedures developed by the American Society for Testing and Materials that simulate actual fire conditions.

They are going to be like how astronauts start with digital plane simulators, then ride in a plane, then fly a propeller plane, then review the charts, then move on to a digital jet simulator, review those charts, then a digital space shuttle simulator, then a space shuttle, with a thousands steps in between.