If there is a worse example of rewarding an undesired behavior, I am challenged to think of it.

Drug users also bring unnecessary drama to a property and usually have more undesirable behavior that goes along with their lifestyle.The one with the eviction would meet our minimum criteria to rent if they had only one eviction and would make full restitution to the previous landlord prior to renting from us. 

For example, North Philly by Temple University is a wonderful place to get into; however, the boarding neighborhood can be a little undesirable and breaking into the Temple market is difficult due to higher cost.

If you can only attract undesirable tenants, you might want to pass as that is a sign the area might be more trouble than it's worth.

But the expenses and lack of control make it undesirable.

That would be an agent being totally honest to a seller with an undesirable property in its "as is" condition.

I am certainly not in the hyperinflation camp, because historically that has never happened with the core currency (U.S. dollar), only peripheral currencies.

As we all know, vacant buildings in the middle of neighborhoods can cause trouble and cast dreary shadows, with vandalism, and undesirable foot traffic.

Is there something about this property that makes it undesirable?

What is the MAIN reason that a foreclosure is so undesireable to a homeowner?