Willful Destruction of Property?

Willful Destruction of Property?

Investor · Ewing, NJ · Member since 2015 · 15 posts · 4 votes

I have a troublesome tenant who has a history of causing issues and non-payment in a condo on the second floor. The condo is located in NJ.

Just 2 weeks ago the condo above my unit had a failing washing machine that caused excessive flooding in my unit. We immediately called the HOA to contact the owner of the upstairs unit to shut off water and investigate the issue and had a water mitigation company (ServPro) come. They did emergency mitigation. However they said that the tenant's furniture was in the way and preventing them from completing work necessary to eliminate moisture. The tenant demanded that all his furniture be moved at someone else's expense even though he is required by the lease and HOA bylaws to have renters insurance which would normally cover these expenses for him. He keeps saying that it should be the HOA insurance, landlord insurance, or the owner of the unit upstairs that should cover these expenses for him and refuses to pay to have his personal belongings moved to allow work. ServPro quoted $3000 to have his items moved into a pod while work is done and to have his items moved back, but he refuses to pay a penny for anything (including rent for a year and a half I might add).

To make matters worse, he threatened to unplug all water mitigation equipment left running in the condo used to remove moisture and possible contaminants from the air. I immediately advised him that such actions may cause mold to grow and may be considered Willfull Destruction of Property. He ignored this warning saying maybe this will incentivize the insurance companies to pay to move his belongings. I also asked him in later conversations if he unplugged any equipment and he told me no, all equipment is still plugged in and running.

It is now 2 weeks later and the HOA insurance adjustor came to do an inspection to determine damages and possible coverage. ServPro also came to check on their equipment. Of course the tenant refused to cooperate and didn't show up to let us in even though he had agreed to do so just 2 days ago when making the appointment. Upon entry we found that all of the water mitigation equipment had been unplugged. The adjustor and ServPro noted this and measured moisture in the area, walls and ceilings stating that moisture levels were above levels necessary to grow mold and that his actions may have resulted in secondary damage (mold growth) that might not be covered by insurance. Unfortunately this cannot be confirmed until further work is done which still requires the tenant's furniture to be removed. I recorded a video of our entry that shows all of this in evidence.

The question now is: is this considered Destruction of Property either Willful or through Gross Negligence? If so, I would like to proceed with providing a 3-Day Notice to Quit for such reasons. And then proceeding with eviction proceedings under this premise along with non-payment and breaking lease terms by not having renters insurance. What do you guys think? What's the best way to proceed with evicting the tenant and removing his furniture to allow for work to continue?

I know one possibility is that I pay the $3000 out of pocket to move the tenant's belongings but that I'm not inclined to do so since this tenant has been beyond horrible since day 1 and I do not wish to help him in any way unless insurance can help financially.

What do you guys think?

0Reply
55 views

Most Popular Reply

Rental Property Investor · Prince George's County, MD · Member since 2022 · 177 posts · 187 votes
4y

1. Hire a good attorney who specializes in landlord tenant law/evictions.

2. He broke the terms of his lease by not having (or maintaining) renter's insurance, and that alone should be a reason to send him a notice to vacate.

Good luck.

See this reply in the discussion

10 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Rental Property Investor · Prince George's County, MD · Member since 2022 · 177 posts · 187 votes
    4y

    1. Hire a good attorney who specializes in landlord tenant law/evictions.

    2. He broke the terms of his lease by not having (or maintaining) renter's insurance, and that alone should be a reason to send him a notice to vacate.

    Good luck.

  • Nathan GesnerBusiness Member
    Moderator
    Real Estate Broker · Cody, WY · Member since 2010 · 28k+ posts · 41k+ votes
    4y
    Quote from @Victor Kao:

    Time to evict.

    You can try contacting the City Building Inspector to see if they will visit the property and deem it uninhabitable. That would force him out quickly.

    If that doesn't work, hire an attorney and start the eviction process. Run all communication through the attorney.

    The DIY Landlord Book4.7247 Reviews
  • Theresa HarrisPro Member
    Member since 2019 · 15k+ posts · 11k+ votes
    4y

    He puts the claim in on his insurance and his company gets the money from the other person's insurance company.

    As soon as he gave you permission to enter, you don't need him to be there-you can enter AND if it is an emergency, you do NOT need his permission to enter (eg a burst pipe).

    If he has been horrible since day 1 and you've had issues with non-payment, why have you not hired an eviction attorney to evict him?

  • Rental Property Investor · Prince George's County, MD · Member since 2022 · 177 posts · 187 votes
    4y
    Quote from @Theresa Harris:

    He puts the claim in on his insurance and his company gets the money from the other person's insurance company.

    As soon as he gave you permission to enter, you don't need him to be there-you can enter AND if it is an emergency, you do NOT need his permission to enter (eg a burst pipe).

    If he has been horrible since day 1 and you've had issues with non-payment, why have you not hired an eviction attorney to evict him?

    The last part!!

    Bad tenants don't get better, they get worse.  And a bad tenant from day one should've been out the door ASAP.
  • Investor · Ewing, NJ · Member since 2015 · 15 posts · 4 votes
    4y
    Quote from @Theresa Harris:

    He puts the claim in on his insurance and his company gets the money from the other person's insurance company.

    As soon as he gave you permission to enter, you don't need him to be there-you can enter AND if it is an emergency, you do NOT need his permission to enter (eg a burst pipe).

    If he has been horrible since day 1 and you've had issues with non-payment, why have you not hired an eviction attorney to evict him?


     He doesn't have insurance, which is the whole reason why he's trying to push the cost of moving his stuff on everyone else.

    Unfortunately he never gave me permission to enter. He was supposed to meet us to let us in but because the insurance adjuster and water mitigation company couldn't wait we had to enter without permission.

    Everyone is right: It is time to evict. I have already given 3 days Notice to Quit for Destruction of Property. Filing for eviction will happen on Thursday when the deadline to quit expires. There were many reasons why eviction wasn't started earlier. The main one being that the eviction moratorium was still in place. And then there was temporary rental assistance which was paying part of his rent but also required me not to file for eviction. But now that the eviction ban is over, there is no more rental assistance and the unit is uninhabitable so I can't collect rent anyways, this may be the opportune time to do it.

    The main problem now is still that eviction may take several months and he is purposely blocking the water mitigation process which is making things worse every day. Does anybody know if I can legally have a moving company move his belongings to self storage and then not release the contents until he pays for the cost of moving and storage? This sounds like a reasonable option if all else fails.

  • Theresa HarrisPro Member
    Member since 2019 · 15k+ posts · 11k+ votes
    4y

    You can use the mitigation as a reason to get him out.  If the house cannot be lived in while it is being repaired, he needs to move his stuff out and find another place.  If the lease says he needs his own insurance and he doesn't have it-that is his problem.  Your insurance should cover lost rent while mitigation is happening.

  • Real Estate Agent · Norwalk, CT · Member since 2021 · 22 posts · 7 votes
    4y

    Hi,

    I would definitely look into the comment above to reach out to city to see if the property is still safe to live in. Reach out to your attorney to know what would be the next steps for the tenant as they wait to be evicted. Sorry for the terrible timing to get a tenant that causing so many issues.

  • Bruce WoodruffPro Member
    Contractor/Investor/Consultant · San Diego / Phoenix · Member since 2021 · 12k+ posts · 15k+ votes
    4y
    Quote from @Victor Kao:

    but he refuses to pay a penny for anything (including rent for a year and a half I might add).

    Wait a sec....did you just say that he has not paid rent in 18 months? You got bigger problems than the water issues......

    Seems like this is on you. You choose to invest in a tenant friendly state AND you let a horrible tenant remain in your property without paying.

    I've got no advice for you....good luck. I would sell and put the $$ into stocks or buy gold and silver.....

  • Investor · Ewing, NJ · Member since 2015 · 15 posts · 4 votes
    4y
    Quote from @Theresa Harris:

    You can use the mitigation as a reason to get him out.  If the house cannot be lived in while it is being repaired, he needs to move his stuff out and find another place.  If the lease says he needs his own insurance and he doesn't have it-that is his problem.  Your insurance should cover lost rent while mitigation is happening.


     Is there legal avenue to force him out before the eviction judgement using the mitigation as a reason?

  • Theresa HarrisPro Member
    Member since 2019 · 15k+ posts · 11k+ votes
    4y
    Quote from @Victor Kao:
    Quote from @Theresa Harris:

    You can use the mitigation as a reason to get him out.  If the house cannot be lived in while it is being repaired, he needs to move his stuff out and find another place.  If the lease says he needs his own insurance and he doesn't have it-that is his problem.  Your insurance should cover lost rent while mitigation is happening.


     Is there legal avenue to force him out before the eviction judgement using the mitigation as a reason?


     You'd have to talk to someone who is local.  For having it declared uninhabitable, that would be the city, but may create more problems.  You can try cash for keys (do not give him any money until he's out and make it conditional upon him leaving on a set date and leaving the unit in good condition).  If he starts negotiating remind him he's behind on rent and the alternative is an eviction on his record.

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.