Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 13 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

102
Posts
27
Votes
Levi Gale
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Tempe, AZ
27
Votes |
102
Posts

Who does not use the 50% rule?

Levi Gale
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Tempe, AZ
Posted

Hello,
Who here does not follow the 50% rule when analyzing/purchasing a property for long term hold? There are a few reasons I can see someone not using it i.e. they are relying on appreciation (not my cup of tea), they look forward to equity build up and loan payoff, or maybe they are seasoned investors that know their maintenance and management keeps at a certain percentage.

I am in Arizona a market that dropped significantly since the boom, and I'm starting to think some investors are buying at FMV simply because they expect appreciation. I don't view it as a wise investment, but hell I could be wrong. I view this as the type of speculation that had everybody and their grandmother buying during the boom. Am I wrong here?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

15,749
Posts
10,947
Votes
Will Barnard
  • Developer
  • Santa Clarita, CA
10,947
Votes |
15,749
Posts
Will Barnard
  • Developer
  • Santa Clarita, CA
ModeratorReplied
Originally posted by L Gale:
Hello,
Who here does not follow the 50% rule when analyzing/purchasing a property for long term hold? There are a few reasons I can see someone not using it i.e. they are relying on appreciation (not my cup of tea), they look forward to equity build up and loan payoff, or maybe they are seasoned investors that know their maintenance and management keeps at a certain percentage.
Regardless if you are relying on appreciation or not, that does not remove the expenses. All the 50% rule says is that on average, you can expect to have 50% of your gross rents go to expenses. If you find that other investors are paying prices higher than what you should to get a $100 per door in cash flow after applying the 50% rule, then you must assume that they are either ignorant or have an alternative strategy other than cash flow, not that the 50% rule is thus gone. It will remain over the long haul on most investments, especially those where the gross income is $1000 per month or less.
Looking forward to equity build-up and loan pay-off also has nothing to do with the 50% rule.

Here is what you must decide as an individual investor: Are you willing to buy with limited or even negative cash flow for the long-term appreciation and ammortization play? If so, go fo it. If you are trying to build cash flow to live off, then your stratgey can not be the appreciation game, it must be the cash flow game and if so, you would be less wise to ignore the50% rule of thumb.

Loading replies...