Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 10 years ago,

User Stats

89
Posts
10
Votes
Christopher R.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Cary, NC
10
Votes |
89
Posts

Submetering

Christopher R.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Cary, NC
Posted

Hi! I'm looking at a quad which rents $750 each. Currently, the landlord pays the water/sewer which I think will cost around $50/unit/month. 

My realtor (who is also an investor and a property manager) says I can sub-meter this and have the tenants pay for the water without decreasing their rent. She says she's done it on 15 units in this street. The tenants allegedly did not leave. 

If I pay for the water, my cash-on-cash will be 7%.

If I am able to sub-meter without decreasing the rent,  and have tenants pay for the water, then the cash-on-cash will increase to 10.5%.

Should I buy this quad based on the potential cash on cash instead of the current one?

Loading replies...