Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Rehabbing & House Flipping
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 1 year ago,

User Stats

72
Posts
173
Votes
Joshua Michael Hauman
  • Investor
  • Cleveland, OH
173
Votes |
72
Posts

Forget profits, use this instead

Joshua Michael Hauman
  • Investor
  • Cleveland, OH
Posted

When considering real estate flips, there are a few ways you can look at profitability. Primarily how I evaluate a deal is off expected rate of return. Secondarily I focus on projected profit.

Risk assessment is crucial for me as well but since that is harder to quantify, I won’t describe that in this article. Before I got into real estate, I was a risk management analyst at KeyBank for 2 years, so I think I have a unique perspective on risk. If anyone is interested just leave a comment or DM me on that and I’d be glad to release a post on it.

Why I look at return on investment first is because it tells me more. Cash on cash return factors the cost and scale of deals in a way raw profit does not. For instance, I recently evaluated two potential flips - one with a $30,000 profit projection but requiring a $150,000 investment, the other a $45,000 profit with $270,000 spend.

Deal 1: 20% Return

Deal 2: 16.6% Return

ROI normalizes profit against total invested capital.

By targeting a minimum threshold return (I use 15%), my analysis builds in an acceptable risk/reward ratio. Setting profit goals alone leaves more to be desired- a $100k profit could still be a bad investment if achieving it requires $750k+ capital locked up for months. That would yield a 13.3% return which is under my threshold. Insisting on minimum returns ensures adequate compensation for my money and time as fix and flip is not passive by any means.

As a finance guy what I prefer even more is IRR. Internal rate of return. I like this metric the most as it factors for time value of money. Beyond accounting for investment sizes, IRR considers the element of time.

Take for example 2 deals all things equal, Flip A and Flip B. If Flip A takes 12 months and Flip B takes 6 months, Flip B's annualized return would be higher because capital is freed up quicker to redeploy elsewhere. Profit comparisons fail to capture this time value of money differentiation.

The bottom line is rates standardize investment decision making rather than lump sum profits. A rate of return makes assessing real estate deals simpler by baking in investment scale and in the case of IRR, time. I steer clear of fix and flips that don't meet target ROI thresholds, regardless of profit potential. Making return on capital the central evaluation metric improves my decision making and I hope using this will improve yours.

With Discipline,

Josh

Loading replies...