Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
San Francisco Real Estate Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

20
Posts
4
Votes
David B.
  • Millbrae, CA
4
Votes |
20
Posts

Plan Check Comment: Land Surveyor

David B.
  • Millbrae, CA
Posted

I recently submitted plans for a backyard ADU and a kitchen extension project. The city reviewed the plans and came back asking for this:

Please provide verification from a Civil engineer, a Land surveyor or any other legal documents to show actual location of the property line.

From my understanding, they want something official to use as guidelines for setbacks since the ADU is close to the existing fence. The city wants to use offical property lines for the setback guidance instead of just where the fence is. Does anyone have experience or a referral for someone they've used for the same request? Could something else besides an expensive land survey ($3k is the quote I got so far) be used to satisfy the request?

Loading replies...