Innovative Strategies
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Short-Term & Vacation Rental Discussions
presented by
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c55d/4c55d80d9e9c56307c0657551942956d7cdebf54" alt=""
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
presented by
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bc6e/1bc6eaa078f2be59507d8082e9e6c9db9582a7ec" alt=""
1031 Exchanges
presented by
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43dee/43dee2bdc33dadf362a5d80e12b9887af577574f" alt=""
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated about 2 years ago on . Most recent reply
Is this strategy valid?
I have seen a scenario where a buyer put a property under contract for 70K but decided during Due Diligence wasn't going to buy it so ends up assigning the property, here's how it looks -
Property under contract for 70,000 and the buyer listed it for 100,000 with 30% owner financing. Found a buyer and payed the seller the full amount and holding a private mortgage for the rest.
Does anyone see any problems doing this?