Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Innovative Strategies
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 2 years ago on . Most recent reply

Account Closed
  • Investor
  • New york
0
Votes |
17
Posts

Is this strategy valid?

Account Closed
  • Investor
  • New york
Posted

I have seen a scenario where a buyer put a property under contract for 70K but decided during Due Diligence wasn't going to buy it so ends up assigning the property, here's how it looks -

Property under contract for 70,000 and the buyer listed it for 100,000 with 30% owner financing. Found a buyer and payed the seller the full amount and holding a private mortgage for the rest.

Does anyone see any problems doing this?

Loading replies...