Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Texas Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 5 years ago,

User Stats

151
Posts
5
Votes
Zoe Lee
  • Plano, TX
5
Votes |
151
Posts

Contract with water damage co still valid after denied coverage?

Zoe Lee
  • Plano, TX
Posted

We had sewer water backed up into a multiplex a couple of weeks ago. Our PM sent a water damage company onsite to extract the standing water on emergency.

Later the company called and asked me to sign a contract so they could proceed with some testings, and negotiate with my insurance company. They were confident that it should be covered. They said they could even help with my deductible.

My insurance company denied the claim later.

But their quote is extremely high. Without insurance coverage, we have to find another contractor to do the work.

My question is, is the contract I signed still valid? The contract reads:

Contractor will furnish all materials, equipment, subcontractors and perform all labor necessary to complete the following work (the“Work”): Restore property to Pre-Loss condition.

Contractor shall carry adequate commercial liability insurance and workers’ compensation insurance in the amount legally required and will pay all federal and state taxes on the materials and labor included in the Work. Contractor shall be acting solely for Client and not for Client’s insurer/adjuster.

After I told the guy from the water damage company that my insurance denied, he kind of stopped replying to my text.

I did find another company who can do the job for a fraction of the price. But am I still legally bound with the first company?

This is our first time dealing a water damage company. Subsequently very unfamiliar with their process when insurance is involved.

Could someone share your thoughts if you have dealt with this before?

Thanks very much!

Zoe

Loading replies...