Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Off Topic
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 15 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

17,995
Posts
17,195
Votes
J Scott
Pro Member
  • Investor
  • Sarasota, FL
17,195
Votes |
17,995
Posts

Going Rogue...

J Scott
Pro Member
  • Investor
  • Sarasota, FL
ModeratorPosted

Is it just me, or is the title of Sarah Palin's new book a little bit weird?

While she didn't originally attribute the phrase "going rogue" to herself, does she not realize that "rogue" is not considered a positive attribute? It seems weird that a politician would assign him or herself the trait if he or she could possibly avoid it.

As Dictionary.com would define it:

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/rogue

Given the fact that so many of the "facts" she presents in the book are being disputed by the very campaign that put her on the map, perhaps the attribute fits...

Or maybe she should hire a competent editor for her ghostwriter...

Loading replies...