Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
New Member Introductions
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 8 years ago,

User Stats

39
Posts
5
Votes
Chris Penny
  • Investor
  • Malibu, CA
5
Votes |
39
Posts

Investing though a Corporation

Chris Penny
  • Investor
  • Malibu, CA
Posted

Hi, Everyone. New member here.  We have a single family home that we bought with half down and half hard money that we paid off in a couple years.  Problem is the return is not that great without leverage.  We bought it through our corporation, but found out banks don't want to loan to Corporations for single family homes. You live and you learn.  We will probably end up selling that property to get our equity out.  But it is adjacent to Culver City, a booming area. So we should hold onto it for a few more years, methinks.  Now we are looking for other properties.

Talked to my local Chase banker about commercial lending.  The good news is my personal credit rating (which is not great) does not matter.  The less than good news is that the bank will only loan me what the rents will cover after expenses, and the smallest multi-family they will loan on is 5 units.  They will loan me 65% Loan to value.  They assume 5% vacancy, $250/unit/yr for replacement reserve, property taxes, insurance, utilities, and repair & maintenance.  Take total income and subtract those expenses and it determines the size of the loan I can get on the property. 

One thing I like about this is that the bank won't let me get into a bad deal that I cannot afford.  But it is challenging to find a property that fits their needs and gets me into the deal.

I have $250K-300K to invest.  The bank's minimum loan is $500K.  Properties I can afford end up with a lower loan amount and will not qualify.  Others that qualify end up needing a bigger down payment than I have.  Chase also wants to stay away from areas where properties are cheaper (Inland Empire, Fresno, Bakersfield, etc) because there are many questionable neighborhoods.  But my instincts tells me there are sill a lot of good properties in that area.

Should I approach local banks in those areas?  Should I just wait and save more money for a down payment on a local property?  Or are there other alternatives I am not considering.  

Thanks.

Loading replies...