Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
California Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

52
Posts
9
Votes
Rian Ash
  • Investor
  • San Jose, CA
9
Votes |
52
Posts

CA- Month to Month lease

Rian Ash
  • Investor
  • San Jose, CA
Posted

Hi Bp Experts,

Here is the situation,

I have a property in Hayward, CA. The tenant was on Month to Month lease, but we explicitly have a clause added in the lease that the tenant needs to give 60 day notice if she intends to leave. The tenant just gave me 30 day notice. I understand that in CA, month to month leases have 30 day notice but since my lease explicitly mentioned 60 days, Will my lease cause prevail? 

Thanks!

Loading replies...