Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
California Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

3
Posts
0
Votes
Egan Brown
  • Investor
  • Oakland, CA
0
Votes |
3
Posts

Legal non-confirming duplex in Vallejo...What does that mean?

Egan Brown
  • Investor
  • Oakland, CA
Posted

Hi guys. I'm looking at a legal non-conforming duplex in Vallejo to do a house hack and I'm trying to understand what it's status actually means. I've seen some information on it meaning that the duplex is legally grandfathered in to be able to operate as a duplex but there are some continuous use requirements in some places. I can't seem to get a straight answer on Vallejo. Does anybody know what it means?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

62
Posts
52
Votes
Hai G.
  • Investor
  • San Mateo, CA
52
Votes |
62
Posts
Hai G.
  • Investor
  • San Mateo, CA
Replied

I had a deal on a legal non-conforming property in the East Bay before, which was grandfathered in as a triplex but modern zoning was for a duplex. The implication in my case was that I wasn't able to secure traditional financing (getting a mortgage from a bank) because in the event if the property burns down and needs to be reconstructed, it can't be legally built as a triplex anymore. There might be other implications but that was the main blocker on mine before I proceeded any further.

Loading replies...