Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

27
Posts
4
Votes
Hannah McBee
4
Votes |
27
Posts

Multiple Applicants- One not Qualified

Hannah McBee
Posted

Hi,

I'm creating my landlord documents and the BP template I received has a line that confuses me. Under Qualification Standards (such as 3x/rent income, US resident, etc), it says

"At landlord’s discretion, compensating factors such as an additional security deposit or co-signer (guarantor) may be required for qualification if Applicant fails to meet any one of the above requirements. In the event of multiple applicants, tenancy will be granted to the most qualified, based on the above criteria." 

Is the 2nd sentence saying that if 1 of the 2 applicants are qualified, then both applicants will be accepted? Thinking through different situations makes me hesitant to keep this sentence in the document. There's a difference between having 1 applicant who exceeds the 3x/rent amount with their income but has a spouse as a stay at home parent with no income (thus making that 2nd parent ineligible) vs if one of 1 applicants has a criminal record but the other does not. 

Am I reading or thinking about this wrong? Can someone clarify? Should I revise/remove that sentence? TIA!

Loading replies...