Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 4 years ago,

User Stats

16
Posts
1
Votes
Frank Rizzo
1
Votes |
16
Posts

Self Service Showings

Frank Rizzo
Posted

I own 3 properties, and have been paying an agent to handle showings and fill my vacancies. The one month broker fee is eating into my profits and is proving to be unsustainable. I recently read "landlording on autopilot", Mike Bulter suggests allowing potential tenants to view his properties alone using a lock box, or in my case key pad lock entry, my units all have keypads that I can program one time entry codes. This system sounds like a good idea in theory. But does it really work well? Do potential tenants destroy the property? steal? What about liability? what if someone gets injured or attached while in my property? Does anyone have experience with this set up?

Loading replies...