Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 12 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

203
Posts
50
Votes
Uwe K.
  • Milwaukee, WI
50
Votes |
203
Posts

"Evictions ok" type ads?

Uwe K.
  • Milwaukee, WI
Posted

This occupied my mind all day yesterday:
Probably every major city has some kind of free weekly magazines, full of ads, masked as a TV program, and targeted at the African American community, often lower income range. Here, they are called "The Blue Book" and "The Red Book".
Besides about 50% of the ads promoting some kind of hair-related service, there are some rental ads in there, too, and quite a handful show in big bold letters "EVICTIONS OK".

I was wondering why landlords would target this group of people specifically. Anybody knows (or maybe does it)?

Do they take a higher deposit, evict at the first opportunity and still come out on top?
Do they charge exorbitant rents and gamble that it will offset and future losses?
Are they total junk properties? But evicted tenants are the first to call the city inspector, so can't see how that strategy works.
Hard to rent places where no normal person would go to?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

484
Posts
181
Votes
Mark H.
  • SFR Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
181
Votes |
484
Posts
Mark H.
  • SFR Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
Replied

The broker I hang my license with specializes in this kind of tenant - they advertise for the tenants the big-guys won't take - often getting leads from the leasing offices of the stricter complexes.

The properties that do this all have very narrow criteria - one might take evictions as long as there's a payment agreement, one eviction might be ok, but two is the kiss-of death, etc. I think the biggest draw for the landlords is that even in a city of ~five million people, there are only a few that will actually (knowingly) take these tenants. If you add in the other classes of rejected tenants, (those with big dogs, bad credit, felony records, sex-offenders), etc, you can have a waiting list at even a tired complex in the worst area of town. And my state is extremely landlord-friendly.

I suspect a part of it may be pragmatism - evicting a tenant in a large complex often means they end up couch surfing at another tenant's place in the same property - banning felons just means you end up renting to single women who magically find "Mr Right" (a felon) as a boyfriend the day after she moves in, etc.

If your PM is already tough-as-nails & takes no prisoners, evicting someone with a history isn't really much different than evicting a first-timer and in a large complex, knowing *who* is in your units is a never-ending battle anyway. The tenants I've met were really jaded - they didn't expect to see a deposit returned, they expected to get nailed for junk fees, and they didn't shop by floor plan or decor. They know they're on a *very* short leash, and seem grateful for any chance at housing. Whether that means they've learned to stiff the cell-phone company *instead* of their landlord, I don't know.

Loading replies...