Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

150
Posts
159
Votes
Wade G.
  • Houston, TX
159
Votes |
150
Posts

Are SFHs worth keeping more than a few years

Wade G.
  • Houston, TX
Posted

I have tried to figure this out but I get lost in the details.  I have a couple of houses that I have had for over 10 years and a couple for only a few.  I'm trying to figure out if its worth keeping them that long or if its better to sell them a after a couple of years of holding them as rentals and redeploying the capital.  A few details for this scenario:

- houses are bought with equity gains in the beginning

- all repairs (new AC, roof, paint, flooring, etc.,) is replaced at acquisition so house is in great condition

- no intent of ever paying off the house

- appreciation being normal at 3% for this scenario

- cashflow being $400 month, figuring $200 of the $400 for future repairs and vacancy

- sell and pay capital gains tax rather than 1031

So in my scenario I figure most everything has a 10 year life span...AC, faucets, dishwasher, water heater, will need all fresh paint inside and out, etc.  Basically in 10 years the house has to be rehabbed again and 10k -15k spent.  

Selling in a couple of years the house should still be in good condition, should get to keep more of the net cashflow since you only have one set of tenants and avoiding the future big expenses, and you get to redeploy the capital and capture more equity but pay more closing costs and probably some repair costs on new property.

Waiting 10 years you get more appreciation, more mortgage paydown, but more cashflow has to be saved for rehab.  Could probably refi the house and use that money for rehab to buy another property and capture some equity.

I realize there are many variables to this and I hope it makes sense.  I cant keep my thoughts straight when trying to figure it out.  Maybe its a wash when everything is considered.  In my thinking with normal appreciation, good tenants that dont destroy, it may be better to sell the properties after a couple of years and use that money to by another property but only if there is a huge equity gain.  If not buying for huge equity gains maybe just holding the property 10 plus years is the way to go.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

560
Posts
690
Votes
Jeff Brower
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Willoughby, OH
690
Votes |
560
Posts
Jeff Brower
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Willoughby, OH
Replied

I buy mine with the intention to hold forever. When you gain enough equity you can refi or get a heloc and that money is TAX FREE. Vs selling where you pay capital gains. 

Would you rather sell the goose and take a few golden eggs now or keep the goose that lays the golden eggs forever?

Loading replies...