Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago,

User Stats

71
Posts
10
Votes
Nerissa Marbury
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Richmond, VA
10
Votes |
71
Posts

After tenants moved out, I discover they had extra people & pets

Nerissa Marbury
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Richmond, VA
Posted

After tenants moved out on June 30th, I discovered they had extra people & pets living at the house (both were explicitedly against the lease agreement). The house had excess wear and tear and damage that is above the amounts I collected for cleaning and security deposits.  Is it possible or does it make sense for me to go after back rent for the extra people (there is a different monthly rate for additional people) as well as request funds for the pet (lease said no pets, but if one was needed additional fees and a non-refundable deposit was required).

Since I will have to go to court anyway (for the damages that cost more than the deposits collected), does it make sense for me to go after money not paid due to the breach of contract I'm only discovering (I have physical proof) after they move out? I suspect the additional people, but since you have to give notice before you can enter the property.....they always covered their tracks.

Please advise. I'm coming out of more money than ever due to tenant neglect regarding my property and would like to recover whatever I can within the confines of the law.

Loading replies...