Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

13
Posts
0
Votes
Mitch B.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • frisco, tx
0
Votes |
13
Posts

Toilet height preference . . .

Mitch B.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • frisco, tx
Posted

I am doing a rehab on a new SFR property. Seems like most new elongated toilets are offered with the ADA 17"-19" height vs. the standard height of 16". I think most adults prefer the elongated bowls but I'm concerned about installing a tall toilet for a rental. Any person under 5'4" will have "dangling feet" & that would not be a good thing. Anyone else receive complaints on the tall ADA style toilet?

Thanks,

Mitch

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

4,079
Posts
1,596
Votes
George P.
  • Property Manager
  • Livonia, MI
1,596
Votes |
4,079
Posts
George P.
  • Property Manager
  • Livonia, MI
Replied

Put in the application "tall people only", and u are golden. 

Loading replies...