Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

5
Posts
2
Votes
Mathew Geevarghese
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Plano, TX
2
Votes |
5
Posts

SF Rental Home in DFW with a Pool - Good or Bad idea?

Mathew Geevarghese
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Plano, TX
Posted

Hello BP

Looking for some guidance from investors that have or had homes with an in-ground pool;  specifically in Texas or even more specifically in DFW area.  Looking for some local feedback mainly due to the rental laws in each state are different & Texas seems to be an investor friendly state.  We have a few rentals in Chicago, and would never entertain renting a home with a pool there.  

We recently came across our first home with a good size in-ground pool that is in very good shape.  The landlord in me wants to fill in the pool due to the 'possible liability'.  The long term investor in me wants to keep the pool as the resale value of homes with pools in the area are quite a bit more than without.  

I have seen some general documentation online to have the tenant sign a waver form and attach it as an addendum to the lease; similar to what tenants at an apartment complex would sign for use of common exercise area / common area pools.

Any feed back from investors / attorneys that have some experience dealing with SF rentals with Pools would be greatly appreciated!  

Thank you!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,663
Posts
3,093
Votes
David Faulkner
  • Investor
  • Orange County, CA
3,093
Votes |
2,663
Posts
David Faulkner
  • Investor
  • Orange County, CA
Replied

Bad idea in a vast majority of cases ... only exception I could think of may be super high end luxury rentals where it is expected. The problem is that a pool will not add a significant amount to the rental income you can get, but it will add significantly to your maintenance expense and liability (and perhaps your purchase price too). In fact, if I personally saw a property that was an absolutely smokin' deal and a perfect rental property in every other way except for it having an inground pool, then I would consider buying it and factoring in the cost to demo and fill in the pool with compacted dirt then sod, or perhaps put a deck over it. There actually was a house like that I saw in the recession in Phoenix, but there were so many other unbelievably good deals on the market at that time that I decided to pass and buy something else without a pool instead ... ahh, those were the good old days ...

Loading replies...