Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago,

User Stats

22
Posts
8
Votes
Franky Maslim
  • Atlanta, GA
8
Votes |
22
Posts

What's a good CoC number?

Franky Maslim
  • Atlanta, GA
Posted

Hi all,

Got a question for seasoned veterans around here. After reading some of the discussions, I'm not sure if I fully understand what makes a good CoC number. The numbers I see are around 20%, give or take some, which to me, seems out of reach.

Let's take a look at this hypothetical property (managed by PM)

Price: $90,000

Initial investment (DP, rehab, taxes, insurance, PM fee): $35,000

Estimated rent: $1,400

Cash flow after expenses (including PM fees): ~$420

CoC%: ~9.5%

Does this number look good? I'm working with a PM, and their CoC numbers are nowhere near 20%. Most are around 5% up to 10%. I must be missing something :)

Loading replies...