Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 9 months ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

3
Posts
2
Votes
Jacob Lammott
2
Votes |
3
Posts

RSO Owner move in Eviction in LA

Jacob Lammott
Posted

I am exploring options for purchasing a multi-unit property with a SFH (2b, 1ba, with a detached garage) and 2 ADU units (1- 2b/1ba and 1- 1b/1ba) in Los Angeles. The SFH and the 1b/1ba ADU are currently occupied by tenants under RSO and paying far below market rents. The other 2b/1ba ADU is newly remodeled with a much higher rent value than the other two units and is currently vacant.

Would we be able to owner occupy the SFH 2b/1ba unit and no-fault evict the current tenants? We would then rent the back unit for market rates and keep the tenant in the 1b/1ba unit. I know the rules for Owner move in state that: "The existence of a vacant comparable unit in the building which is also suitable for owner-occupancy is a factor demonstrating possible intent to
circumvent the Rent Stabilization Ordinance [RAC Regulation 613.04] ". So because the other unoccupied unit has the same number of bedrooms owner occupied might be a no-go, but the SFH (2b, 1ba, w/garage) unit has a larger square footage and garage access, so wondering if we might be able to get use that as a means to occupy that unit.

Loading replies...