Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Personal Finance
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 6 years ago,

User Stats

251
Posts
129
Votes
Zachary C.
  • Property Manager
  • Huntsville, AL
129
Votes |
251
Posts

Loan Payoff Efficiency

Zachary C.
  • Property Manager
  • Huntsville, AL
Posted

So, let’s say I am considering the topic and idea of the prioritization of paying off loans.

To me, it only makes sense to consider the principle of the question for the initial prioritized list. I believe that consideration of individual circumstances could undoubtedly sway the order of the list. However, those should be regarded as secondary and only applied once a properly ordered list has been established based on the principle of efficiency.

The idea of efficiency, as I mean it here, is given a scenario with more than one debt, which should be the logical choice to focus on and pay off first? Secondary factors like how much I have available to pay down with (now or via monthly budget) or the opportunity cost (investments that could be made instead) must be eliminated so that only the efficiencies/deficiencies involved in the loans and their order of early payment are considered. There are too many possible scenarios that could be created with secondary factors which is why I think they should be considered after making a logical list; so that pros and cons of changing the order could be properly weighed. I hope this is a fairly logical approach to take as real life can change factors randomly and we must ultimately cope with that as required.

So, we must break down a scenario with only the essentials on the table:

We have some undefined amount that can be applied to one loan at a time (for the sake of focusing on the efficiency principle).

In addition to being an undefined amount it can also fluctuate in unknown amounts and directions (keeping real life involved).

All loans are assumed to be fixed rate and amortized.

All the loans are at different points in their life cycle of pay down.

The loans could have had the same, different, or mixed original amortization periods.

We will have 4 loans to prioritize (listed in no particular order) so we can work off the same example:

A) Remaining principle $94,925, Interest rate 3.75%, Monthly payment $710

B) Remaining principle $54,814, Interest rate 5.50%, Monthly payment $388

C) Remaining principle $12,741, Interest rate 3.90%, Monthly payment $532

D) Remaining principle $41,495, Interest rate 5.25%, Monthly payment $355

Given the above information:

Is there some fundamental flaw in looking at the question in this manner?

If so, what is it?

Is there enough information to make an informed decision regarding the question?

If not, what information would you still require to do so?

If so, how do you prioritize your list for efficiency AND how did you come to that conclusion?

Loading replies...