Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 6 years ago on . Most recent reply presented by

User Stats

5,072
Posts
5,128
Votes
Scott Mac
  • Austin, TX
5,128
Votes |
5,072
Posts

Syndication - Is a PPM required for 3 or less outside investors?

Scott Mac
  • Austin, TX
Posted

I had a fellow syndicator in Massachusetts tell me that a PPM is not required for 3 or fewer investors.

1.   Is this correct for the SEC if it's multi-state, and would it fly in a Texas only offering?

2. Would it make any difference if it was an LLC or Tenets in Common offering?

3.  If it is true, would not having a PPM increase the sponsors exposure in a lawsuit in any way?

4.  Also, If it's true, are there any states to avoid this in?

If anyone has any input on this it would be appreciated.

Thanks, 

Scott Mac....

Austin, TX.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

284
Posts
314
Votes
Amy Wan
  • Attorney
  • Los Angeles, CA
314
Votes |
284
Posts
Amy Wan
  • Attorney
  • Los Angeles, CA
Replied

@Alina Trigub thanks for the tag.

Generally, PPMs are not required where you take funds from accredited investors only—they’re technically only required where you’re taking funds from even one non-accredited investor. That being said, even institutional deals that are accredited investors only have PPMs because its good practice and, as you mentioned above, the lack of one increases one’s exposure.

I’ve never heard of any rule that says fewer than 3 investors don’t require a PPM. Securities law doesn’t look at number of investors, but whether something is or is not an investor contract (aka security).

Loading replies...