Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago, 09/02/2018

User Stats

49
Posts
2
Votes
Jim Witten
  • Walnut Creek, CA
2
Votes |
49
Posts

How is Broker Protection Clause, Invalidated?

Jim Witten
  • Walnut Creek, CA
Posted

I thought previous listing brokers are protected regardless. That's the whole point to prevent a seller from just swapping listing agents or firing listing agents.

 When an agent shows "SARAH" the property, "Sarah" is now part of that agents list of names. So if "Sarah" later buys the house down the road, the original broker still gets a part of the commission. Because he was the procuring cause right.

Why would seller hiring a different broker invalidate any of that protection to the original broker?