Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

48
Posts
9
Votes
Andy Tomaswick
  • Hudson, OH
9
Votes |
48
Posts

Schedule K-1

Andy Tomaswick
  • Hudson, OH
Posted

Hi All,

I recently applied for a conventional mortgage, and as part of the preapproval process turned over my account statement for a Scottrade account that I use a my investing exposure to assets other than real estate.

When the underwriter was reviewing the application, they asked about a specific asset class that I held (ticker: GCC), a "continuous commodity index fund" that I use as my exposure to commodities.  I only had about $2.5K in the fund, and owned less than .001% of it.

My question is - why does the underwriter care about this? Is it somehow different than the other index tracking funds that I have that track stocks?  Is there some other way to get exposure to commodities that wouldn't come up on a underwriting search?

Thanks in advance for the feedback - looking forward to it!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

9,934
Posts
10,788
Votes
Chris Mason
  • Lender
  • California
10,788
Votes |
9,934
Posts
Chris Mason
  • Lender
  • California
ModeratorReplied

K-1 means she needs to verify/confirm/prove that you own less than 25% of it OR (not relevant to you but FYI) treat it as self-employment if you own 25% or more. 

Depending on the investor, she may not be able to use common sense or arithmetic to prove this.

If that showed a loss in 2015, she's looking to prove you don't own 25% so she doesn't have to treat it as a monthly debt obligation. If it showed a gain in 2015, she's trying to save herself from having to ask you for YTD P&L and Balance Sheet for the business. 

  • Chris Mason
  • Loading replies...