Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 9 years ago on .

User Stats

1
Posts
0
Votes
Fritz Schneider
  • Investor
  • Paia, HI
0
Votes |
1
Posts

Is 3.17 the magic number?

Fritz Schneider
  • Investor
  • Paia, HI
Posted

Hi, new investor here trying to make sense of the world. Feel free to point me to things I should have read that explain this that I may have missed. 

Background: I own one rental property and am looking to buy a second. I'm speaking with lenders and from what I understand they generally count 75% of gross rents toward income and require that DTI be <= .42. Suppose I'm at .42. I think this means that I need to find a property for which the debt service ratio is 1 / (.75*.42) =~ 3.17. That is, for every $1 debt that I'd add with the new property it must generate at least $3.17 in gross rents. Verify that the math is right by working backwards: if I receive $317 in rent it's discounted by the lender by 75% leaving $237. If my debt is $100 than that's (roughly) a .42 debt to service ratio.

This seems like a tough constraint. Is it the case that most small investors are constrained in this way? How do investors achieve greater leverage?  

I think the answer is some combination of non-qualifying loans and that there is some inflection point beyond which you're no longer an amateur and so your finances are evaluated differently, but I'm having a hard time understanding how it works. 

Thanks!