Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 11 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

19
Posts
7
Votes
Paul Altman
  • Canoga Park, CA
7
Votes |
19
Posts

Deal funding question

Paul Altman
  • Canoga Park, CA
Posted

Hi

I know a lot of HM or PM lenders will not lend more than a certain percentage of a propertys current value (I've heard 65-70%) to someone looking for funds to rehab a house. I understand they do this to have a better chance of recouping their money incase the borrower falls through and have to sell the house but I am curious about how borrowers typically find the additional money to fill in the 30-35% as well as the rehab costs they couldn't get from the primary lender.

Are the borrowers expected to have some of their own funds to contribute to the deal or is it standard for them to find other lenders to fill in the rest of the needed capital? Thanks

Loading replies...