Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

3
Posts
1
Votes
Casey Mayton
1
Votes |
3
Posts

make your case: Stocks vs Rentals

Casey Mayton
Posted

Read through the forums but looking for current advice on a strong argument for choosing rentals over non-qualified stocks over the long term. The biggest differences I can see would be the rental 1031 to avoid taxes as you scale bigger, whereas NQ stocks would pay taxes each time they're sold. However, even with leveraging 75% money after the down payment, stock returns seem like they could make much higher returns. Of course it depends what stocks, but even some "high quality" stocks like Amazon can have 10,000% growth in just 20 years. I think both options provide a tax free step-up in cost basis at death, so they seem them being equally tax and legacy friendly that way. 

The top benefits I see to both would be:

stocks- much simpler to manage and liquidate stocks vs rentals and higher ROI even without the leverage
rentals
- income offset by taxes/depreciation and 1031 exchange for tax free liquidations


Would appreciate if someone could make a very strong case that I'm missing, for rentals beating the simplicity and returns of stocks. Thank you!!

Most Popular Reply

Account Closed
  • Investor
  • Singapore
3,225
Votes |
1,581
Posts
Account Closed
  • Investor
  • Singapore
Replied
Originally posted by @Casey Mayton:

Read through the forums but looking for current advice on a strong argument for choosing rentals over non-qualified stocks over the long term. The biggest differences I can see would be the rental 1031 to avoid taxes as you scale bigger, whereas NQ stocks would pay taxes each time they're sold. However, even with leveraging 75% money after the down payment, stock returns seem like they could make much higher returns. Of course it depends what stocks, but even some "high quality" stocks like Amazon can have 10,000% growth in just 20 years. I think both options provide a tax free step-up in cost basis at death, so they seem them being equally tax and legacy friendly that way. 

The top benefits I see to both would be:

stocks- much simpler to manage and liquidate stocks vs rentals and higher ROI even without the leverage
rentals
- income offset by taxes/depreciation and 1031 exchange for tax free liquidations


Would appreciate if someone could make a very strong case that I'm missing, for rentals beating the simplicity and returns of stocks. Thank you!!

Why do you have to choose? How about Stocks AND Rentals? 

EDIT: Just read some of the responses and while I get this is a REI board the sheer nonsense posted about stocks is amazing. Like every stock will lose money over 30 years! Or stocks are speculation and REI is 100% sure profit. What total and utter CRAP.

Stocks via ETFs and Mutual funds allow you to literally own a piece of the entire market. What equivalent vehicle exists for rentals? Sure there are REITs and Syndications but these are tiny compared to an S&P 500 or global market fund. And stocks have close to ZERO transaction costs and second to second liquidity. You can buy with very little capital and add small amounts regularly. You can leverage (via margin) and you can borrow against your brokerage holdings. So not that different from real estate.

Dont get me wrong. I own real estate but also own index funds and stocks. There is a place for both in any diversified portfolio.

Loading replies...