Overland Park, KS · Member since 2013 · 11 posts · 0 votes
Next Week I am actually starting to look for my first SFH investment property. Im looking between 100-200k homes build in the 70's. Most of the ones I am checking into have been updated in the past 10 years. I am have done a ton of homework, much right here on the site. I've got most of my forumlas down and I know what I can personally justify or not justify buying. My question is now that I am actually looking, I am trying to find a list of red flags that would cause me to not even consider a certain house. Obviously roofs, etc. but I am just looking for a list of quite a few things that should disqualify a sfh from my list. Thanks for any help and this forum has been extremely helpful to me over the last few months.
I would suggest making sure you know the weird issues for your area -- for instance, when we started looking in Maryland, we found out (seems like, anyway) the entire state seems to be sitting on top of natural springs that like to run through basements if the pumps stop working in a storm. Doesn't matter what kind of deal you get on it if you'll be fixing water damage every other year. We always look for drainage issues, how far from landfills, pig farms, etc. We've ruled out a lot of homes simply by mapping with satellite feature and seeing what's around (quarry starting next street over, huge power lines, beautiful view of industrial complex, etc.)
Hello BRadley Cottam and welcome to Bigger Pockets!
(Almost) nothing disqualifies a house depending on the price. The things that would disqualify a house for "me" personally:
- Squatters living there
- Crumbling foundation
- House has gaping holes - could be animals living in there, dying
- House has been condemned
- Burned out
Other investors might be willing to take these things on.
I would suggest making sure you know the weird issues for your area -- for instance, when we started looking in Maryland, we found out (seems like, anyway) the entire state seems to be sitting on top of natural springs that like to run through basements if the pumps stop working in a storm. Doesn't matter what kind of deal you get on it if you'll be fixing water damage every other year. We always look for drainage issues, how far from landfills, pig farms, etc. We've ruled out a lot of homes simply by mapping with satellite feature and seeing what's around (quarry starting next street over, huge power lines, beautiful view of industrial complex, etc.)
Lynn, you are right about some of areas of Maryland. There is a street I know of that DOES have a stream under it and many of the homes on one side of the street spanning several blocks have water problems in heavy rains.
Somehow and for some reason, someone called it Lakewood Avenue...go figure.
What I find useful is to have a limit on the dollar amount it will take to rehab the property. the in your due diligence period have your inspections etc and ANY red flag that shows up should be analyzed and have a dollar value assigned to them in order to calculate what it will cost to get it up to speed. If that cost exceeds the limit you have set and the seller is unwilling to renegotiate, you need to move on and find another deal.
Red flags depend on your goals and temperament. What you're willing to do (time and energy) and money. For me, I'll consider almost anything as long as it can be fixed "permanently" - meaning, nothing is ever fixed permanently, a roof will eventually need to be replaced. But, a bad roof can be replaced and then last the "life" of the roof. OTOH, springs under the house - yuck. Ongoing problem. I avoid ongoing problems.