Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 18 years ago,

User Stats

452
Posts
18
Votes
Matt H
18
Votes |
452
Posts

Are Old Buildings Okay?

Matt H
Posted

Hello, I'm looking at some older buildings. They appear to be built early 1900's. Like I think 1930 or so. If you were to buy and you got an building inspection that would turn up any major problems right? So as long as that came back reasonably okay then wouldn't the building still be fine? I know banks don't like it but we don't know what old is here in North America. There's properties in Europe that still sell all day long that are hundreds upon hundreds of years old and they still rent them out.

So what do think would you buy an older building like say built in 1930? Why or why not? Because I'm looking at one now that I'm considering.

Loading replies...