Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 7 years ago,

User Stats

185
Posts
56
Votes
Andy Cross
  • Wholesaler
  • Culver City, CA
56
Votes |
185
Posts

Determining Value When There are Little/No Comps in the Area

Andy Cross
  • Wholesaler
  • Culver City, CA
Posted

We've got a lead in a rural area of Southern California; north of LA. This lead has potential to be a fix/flip or a rental.

However, there is only ONE comparable within the last 3-6 months. All the other properties that were recently sold were built 30-40 years later, and are all rehabs.

I feel I cannot determine value just off this one comp.

I've spoken to realtors in the area, and they all have sent me the same list of comps; thanks, but I pulled this same list from Redfin.

How do I make an offer with only one comp and no budget to consult with an appraiser? 

Loading replies...